Regie:
Francis Ford CoppolaKamera:
Gordon WillisMusik:
Nino RotaBesetzung:
Marlon Brando, Al Pacino, James Caan, Richard S. Castellano, Robert Duvall, Sterling Hayden, John Marley, Richard Conte, Al Lettieri, Diane Keaton (mehr)Streaming (7)
Inhalte(1)
Don Vito Corleone ist einer der mächtigsten Mafiabosse New Yorks. Doch seine Tage sind gezählt, als er sich weigert, ins aufkeimende Drogengeschäft einzusteigen. Nach seiner Ermordung wird ausgerechnet sein jüngerer Sohn Michael, der mit Vitos Geschäften nie etwas zu tun haben wollte, sein Nachfolger – und der erbarmungslose Rächer seines Vaters. (arte)
(mehr)Kritiken (15)
In terms of filmmaking, it’s flawless and brilliant, but the story didn’t captivate me that much and I didn’t care how it would all end. The best thing in the film is Marlon Brando’s performance, even when he’s laying down silent, he’s the most charismatic character on screen. Even though this film didn’t thrill me as much as I expected, I’m still quite curious about the second part.
()
Ein Klassiker. Interessanter als die Emotionen sind hier die Enthüllung der faszinierend dargestellten Welt der Mafia-Familie aus New York und die Studie ihrer Figuren. Eine elegante Filmarbeit, die es nicht eilig hat, weil sie jedes Stück der Geschichte genießen möchte. Die beste Schauspielleistung mit kreativen Details, welche seine Figur magnetisch interessant machen, hat hier der unglaubliche Marlon Brando geliefert. Ein vornehmes und innerlich trauriges Porträt von Menschen mit verzerrten Idealen, deren einziger echter Wert die Familie ist. Und die Schilderung des Zerfalls dieser Familie, weil nicht immer die Regel "wie der Vater, so der Sohn" gilt. Meine Lieblingspassage (neben allen Szenen mit Brando) ist überraschenderweise der romantische und der einzige ausgesprochen schöne Teil in dem ganzen langen Film – Al Pacinos Werben um die schöne italienische Dorfbewohnerin und der Respekt gegenüber ihrem Vater.
()
Erst die Filmleinwand hat mir endlich die Größe dieses Juwels spüren lassen, welches mir auf dem eingegrenzten und verflachten Bereich des Fernsehbildschirms immer etwas ausschweifend und im Vergleich zu anderen Werken Coppolas tiefenlos vorkam. Das war natürlich ein Fehler. Der Pate ist ein außerordentlich robustes Epos, ein rein narrativer Film, dessen Monumentalität voller feiner Details und Szenen ist, die architektonisch präzise aufgebaut worden sind (die Art und Weise, wie der Regisseur die verschiedenen Erzählbausteine kombiniert, um die intensive Spannung zu verstärken, ist einzigartig). Wir können den Film nicht in Teilen konsumieren, denn unsere Aufmerksamkeit kann man gerade hierbei nicht einfach abschalten. Coppola ist intensiv, eine Szenen ergibt sich quasi logisch von der anderen (dieser verbindende Schnitt ist dabei kein Selbstzweck) und es ist faszinierend, die Transformationen der Charaktere zu verfolgen, bei denen es aussieht, als alterten Sie mit dem Film und würden sich innerlich radikal ändern. Der Pate stellt ein "Filmleben“ dar, ein radikales Manifest der fiktiven Zeit, das mit seiner Eingeklemmtheit und Kraft die aktuelle Zeit vollends zu kontrollieren vermag. Eine packende, kontemplative Erfahrung, welche wirklich der großen Leinwand bedarf.
()
Ich habe endlich Zeit und Lust gefunden, mir diesen viel gepriesenen und legendären Film anzusehen, und ich muss sagen, dass all die Kritiken und verschiedenen Bewertungen oder Kommentare gar nicht so falsch waren. Der Pate ist wahrlich ein guter Film und ein glänzendes Juwel des Kinos, das die Aufmerksamkeit des Publikums verdient. Das Schicksal der Mitglieder der Familie Corleone ist fesselnd, traurig, erschreckend, kurzum, perfekt geeignet für einen Film. Und wenn all dies in einer historisch schwierigen Zeit und in einer unwirtlichen Umgebung stattfindet, kommt etwas Unvergessliches dabei heraus. Kurz gesagt, um mich nicht zu wiederholen und das Gleiche wie andere zu schreiben, sage ich nur, dass er mir gefallen hat, und zwar sehr gut - ein wohlverdienter Spitzenplatz in der Liste der besten Filme.
()
The Godfather is not only the best gangster saga, but also the best film about the games of men and the fate of women, and Al Pacino is the best actor I know. He can act with his eyes without even moving an eyebrow. I will never forget the look he gave Appolonia when he gave her the necklace during the courtship, or when he observed his adversaries at Don Corleone's funeral. Fantastico! Fenomenale!
()
The Godfather is the ultimate gangster movie; there’s hardly anything more to add. Marlon Brando is spectacular and not even Al Pacino can surpass him. This is mainly because Marlon Brando’s performance is perhaps one of the greatest acting performances I have ever experienced in a film. Excellent from start to finish. Although the film has 175 minutes, what is it compared to one decade of in the lives of a mobster family, which is everything but boring.
()
I give you an offer you cannot refuse. Either you watch The Godfather and get to see the zenith of filmmaking craft or... No comment. But in that case, don’t be surprised if you find a part of a horse in your bed this evening. As an adaptation of the book, I give this “only" four stars, but as a movie in its own right, it must get a full five.
()
A legendary gem, the pinnacle of mafia movies, and a perfectly punctuated saga that cannot be forgotten. Al Pacino's most kingly role.
()
I can kind of see why this movie became a legend. To be honest, I didn't enjoy it much, but I have to admit that the sound, the execution of some of the scenes are brilliant. That's why the four stars... otherwise simply: the mafia doesn't do much for me, its hierarchy not at all, I caught myself bored many times. I don't need to see it again, nor do I want to. Yes, Brando was great, Pacino's transformation was great, but I have a sneaking suspicion that I would have enjoyed it much more as a book. But I liked the ending, I really did :-)
()
An audience-attractive theme, a strong story, interesting characters, quality direction, and a luxurious cast. What more could you want? This is one of the rare cases where artistic critics and viewers alike agreed and appreciated one of the seminal works of modern cinema. Overall impression: 95%.
()
Puzo's book was once recommended to me by my grandmother and, it completely captivated me. I felt the atmosphere of the family and from the first page it was as though I already knew them all - it felt like they were my own family. Still, I was a little worried about what the movie would end up being like, but Coppola handled the adaptation perfectly. He preserved the atmosphere, honed all the details, and, with amazing precision, made sure to keep the fans of the original happy. Marlon Brando, as Don Vito, made an indelible mark on cinema history, and Al Pacino gave one of the best performances of his career. The Godfather is a legend, and I'm glad I finally got to see it.
()
A story of gigantic proportions, its adaptation into a screenplay undoubtedly required a very skillful hand. Coppola’s direction is excellent, the pace is indeed very slow, but the scenes from Sicily are captivating and overshadow the relative feeling of emptiness from the beginning of the film. There are many characters and someone who hasn't read the book, will need to see the film multiple times. The performances by the actors are stunning. Above all, Al Pacino's transformation is masterfully portrayed. The enormous running time, of course, is understandable and most likely it couldn't have been done differently. The action is nothing special, but that can be overlooked. The relationships between the characters are well depicted, but in my opinion, The Godfather is not the best mafia movie of all time.
()
Amazing. If The Godfather was more than four hours long, I still wouldn’t even blink, because I’d be afraid to miss a major or dominant moment – that’s how deep Coppola’s flawless narration draws me in and how opulently the twists flow. Precise in every aspect, from the layering of storylines that depend on the most personal acquaintance with the characters and the nature of their world, to the performances, which have received all the possible praise. Chilling, realistic and timeless. Godfather of the Cinema.
()
A meticulously crafted film about American organized crime that kept me entertained from start to finish. My rating is definitely influenced by the fact that I have always enjoyed films with this theme set in the 1920s to 1960s. It was the golden era of organized crime when even brutal murder had class (as in, the killer wore a smashing fedora). These days, just before death, the murder victim hears from the mouth of a tattooed hoodlum with a thick accent that he’s a son of a bitch. There’s no comparison.
()
It was bound to happen one day. I kind of avoided this movie, maybe on purpose, maybe not. I remember watching it in the past, but that's probably only because I stayed up late as a kid and it happened to be on. I don't remember anything from it except for one single scene. Yes, of course, it's the scene with the horse's head, which completely floored me as a kid. Even today, it has great buildup, mainly because if you don't know the film, you have no idea what to expect. But the whole film is like that. It gradually reveals its cards, and it's up to you whether your jaw drops or you yawn in boredom. Yes, it's long, but that's just how it is. The story isn't complicated, but there's always something happening. Simply watching Marlon Brando is a pleasure. Coppola isn't a genius in how he presents violent scenes and shootings, but when they do happen, they are meticulously crafted. Primarily, it's a family saga, and that's why the violent scenes have such a strong impact. Some films are talked about in superlatives, and then nothing more. This film is definitely talked about a whole lot.
()