Machine Gun Preacher

Gerard Butler habe ich diesmal nicht einmal sein Schießen geglaubt. Seine "Verwandlung“ von einem drogensüchtigen Motorradfahrer, der aus dem Gefängnis entlassen wird, in einen Mann, der Gott gefunden hat, und später in einen Rambo-Kämpfer, welcher Entführer von afrikanischen Kindern mit Blei füllt, hat mich deshalb überhaupt nicht beeindruckt. Verstehen Sie mich bitte nicht falsch – ich habe nichts gegen Filme, die eine beliebige Religion von der attraktiveren Seite zeigen. Aber was sollte das hier sein? Ein ungewollt lächerlicher Film. Die Tatsache, dass er auf wahren Begebenheiten beruht, hat ihn in meinen Augen nicht glaubhafter gemacht. (04.11.2013)

Der Autor von dem meisterhaften Monster's Ball fing an, an Gott zu glauben, und hat seinen Verstand verloren. Aber das Herz blieb – sein Film erinnerte mich an Stones World Trade Center – ein einfach, pathetisch dargestellter Stoff über das Leiden der Unschuldigen und darüber, dass man sich gegenseitig helfen sollte. Ein einfacher, naiver Film für durchschnittliche Amerikaner*innen, welcher Zuflucht bei der Bibel findet. Die Szenen der Predigten über Gott, von denen es hier mehr als in einem Dokumentarfilm über den Papst gibt, sind für atheistische Zuschauer*innen nicht verdaulich und entwerten ihr Filmerlebnis. Wenn danach der Prediger Butler die Schrotflinte in die Hand nimmt, wird der Film zwar ein bisschen unterhaltsamer, aber die Dramatisierung wirkt nicht glaubwürdig. Den dritten Stern gebe ich wegen dem bunten und exotischen Soundtrack, den ich mir schon vorher angehört habe – deshalb war für mich das Erlebnis angenehmer; und wegen dem "großen Herzen“ für Kinder aus Afrika. Wenn ich ein größerer Zyniker wäre, hätte ich an sie überhaupt nicht gedacht. (04.01.2012)

I have one big problem with Machine Gun Preacher, or maybe two. The first is that Childer’s transformations are terribly sudden and the movie concentrates much more on the less interesting parts, like when the asshole becomes a nice guy, while it concentrates only very briefly on the part when the nice guy becomes a murderous maniac, which is much better and more interesting. And Butler’s acting is excellent and it would have been far more bombastic if they had concentrated on a shorter section of time in more detail, rather than trying to map his entire “working" life. The second problem is that I don’t much like what happens in this picture. Building an orphanage in the middle of a war zone is a very bad idea. Did Sam ever think about what those people were going to do when they grow up? (19.05.2012)

I’d heard about Kony and the horrors in Africa long before the film Machine Gun Preacher came out, especially after the big campaign last year. So when I heard they made a movie about a guy fighting against violence—ironically, using violence—I was intrigued. I’d been looking forward to it for months, but honestly, I ended up really disappointed. Gerard Butler wasn’t a terrible choice for the lead, but the way they told the story was all over the place. Sam Childers, Butler’s character, is supposed to go through this major transformation from bad to good. But the film handles it in the weirdest way. First, we see Bad Sam: he gets out of prison, does a bunch of awful stuff, and continues being a terrible person. He’s using drugs, killing people, just all-around bad. His family finds God, and he literally laughs in their faces. Then, suddenly, in about 30 seconds, he has a revelation—boom, he’s sitting in church. That’s it. No real transition, no character growth. It’s like flipping a switch, and we’re supposed to just go along with it. This wasn’t a one-time thing either—the movie kept pulling this kind of emotional whiplash. The film doesn’t really explore the emotions or inner struggles you'd expect from a story like this, and that’s a huge missed opportunity. This is supposed to be a film about a man’s moral and emotional journey, but it skips over the parts that matter most. That being said, there were moments worth watching—some scenes were genuinely good. But overall, I was let down from the start, and that feeling stuck with me through to the end. The real-life Sam Childers, who appears at the end, felt way more compelling than the film version. And let’s not even get started on the religious overtones that run through the whole movie. But hey, that’s how it goes in American cinema sometimes. Hallelujah, I guess. (23.04.2012)

I did not believe it. The problem to me is the main actor, or rather the character he plays. It's not that Gerard Butler’s performance is poor, not at all, quite the opposite, but apparently the script does not allow the viewer to feel his transformation impulsively and realistically enough. So I was not convinced by bad Butler becoming good Butler. And since that is supposed to be a key element of the film, it completely failed. At least they maintained a consistent pattern (rough bad Butler, rough good Butler), and fortunately, they didn't turn him into a monk. However, it is still a very inconsistent thing, the same goes for the technical aspect. At times it looks like we won't even see any blood, you get the impression that it is aiming for PG-13 and then some unprecedented brutality follows. I expected the director of Quantum of Solace to have a much stronger action directorial style. I really don't know what to think about all of this. In any case, I believe that this film did not impress any of the many ethnic groups or film fans, despite (or precisely because) everyone could take something of their own from it. (25.03.2012)