Regie:
Adam MacDonaldDrehbuch:
Adam MacDonaldKamera:
Christian BielzMusik:
Frères LumièresStreaming (4)
Inhalte(1)
Eigentlich sollte es ein romantisches Camping-Wochenende in der Wildnis werden, so hatte es sich Alex für seine Verlobte Jenn ausgedacht. Raus aus der Großstadt, rein in den Nationalpark, eine Wanderung ohne Landkarte und technische Hilfsmittel. Die junge Anwältin Jenn lässt ihr geliebtes Smartphone jedoch nur widerwillig zurück und auch der Park-Ranger warnt die beiden vor der gnadenlosen Wildnis. Nach drei Tagen Fußmarsch wird klar: Jenn und Alex haben sich hoffnungslos verlaufen, ihre Vorräte sind fast verbraucht. Die Situation wird immer unheimlicher. Haben die beiden ohne es zu wissen das Revier eines gefährlichen Schwarzbären betreten? Und was hat der merkwürdige Fremde in dem Waldgebiet verloren? (Pandastorm pictures)
(mehr)Kritiken (9)
A very realistic and minimalist survival flick, the script can’t have been more than five pages long. I think that’s what it must look like when two people get lost while camping in the wilderness and get attacked by a bear on their way back. The level of credibility and crudeness is very high in Backcountry, including those “main” scenes when the bear attacks. It’s on a completely different level (in conception and ambition) that this year’s Grizzly, fortunately so, I must say. My only quibbles are the self-serving and pointless episodes with the foreigner and that the survival part “proper” begins rather late. Edit: I sometimes think about this film, even a year later, and that main attack scene still remains very much alive. Quality.
()
Über das Hauptpaar sagt uns der Film nicht viel. Und darüber, dass man mit ihnen eine Stunde verbringt, in der sie durch den Wald wandern und sich oft streiten, freut man sich als Zuschauer nicht besonders. Ab der energischen Dramatisierung (hart, grausam) wird der Film aber spannend und das letzte Drittel ist echt gut. In den Schlüsselszenen ist der Schnitt sehr unübersichtlich, aber wenigstens ist der Schrei des Opfers grausam und man spürt daraus eine Agonie des Schmerzes. Die Ambiente-Musik und einige mit ihr harmonierende psychedelische Aufnahmen wirken in einem Film aus der wilden Natur seltsam, es ist aber akzeptabel.
()
Robuster, realistischer und vor allem besser als der diesjährige Last Frontier. Backcountry hat sich vor allem durch die Szene des Bärenangriffs auf das Zelt seine vierte Stern verdient; so etwas Frostiges habe ich dieses Jahr noch nicht gesehen. P.S. Herr Korbitch wird wahrscheinlich eine ziemlich langweilige Sache sein.
()
Not even Bear Grylls can prepare you for some situations. The real terror, which will make you put your hand over your eyes, comes only after an hour, but the preceding minutes will still keep you on the edge of your seat. With its subjective shots, close-ups of the protagonists’ faces and shallow depth of field, Backcountry effectively evokes a feeling of a constant threat of uncertain origin. We can infer exactly what and from whom the central couple are under threat and how much danger they are in. The hour-long build-up also serves to introduce Jenn and Alex, to whom we are not indifferent thanks to the fact that they act sensibly (they have rational justifications for most of the decisions that turn out to be wrong) and, at the same time, they are not perfect, but they are completely honest with each other. With its visceral intensity, the final act is thus exhausting not only physically, but also emotionally. Backcountry is proof that even with a very simple concept, it is possible to make a truly brilliant and brutal survival movie that is consistent and convincing, compared to which Wild with Reese Witherspoon, for example, seems like a casual walk in the park. 85%
()
It is impossible to avoid a slight disappointment, because it is far from being a survival drama with a bear as I suppose we all thought. The bear is only here for 15 minutes, it looks very nice and the brutal attack on the tent has a perfect atmosphere, and the beautiful representation of human entrails is a pleasure, but that's all. At least the film has beautiful scenery, is decently shot, and even though mostly nothing happens, it doesn't bore and leaves you in anticipation. IT was nice the likeable couple were nicely equipped (first-aid kit, bear spray, flares), the mysterious stranger was pretty freaky, but that he didn't show up in the film anymore I take as a big minus, the guy could have caused a decent mess. The finale was more or less not even there, it ends unfinished and I hate that. But 60%, and the build up to a fourth star was there, but I can’t forgive the ending with no duel, no fights and no climax.
()
Deliverance with a bear. The script is fairly tame, but just enough to maintain credibility, and at the right moments, to stretch to the limit the negative feelings about the suffering of the two main characters. The bear attack scene is one of the most shocking and intense I've ever seen in film; after seeing it, nobody can convince me to go hiking in the countryside.
()
A terrible bore with two total morons. Or maybe also a yuppie horror movie about how if you get off a trail in the countryside featuring half-meter high signs in the trees telling you where to unload your kayak, where to pitch your tent, and where to shit, you can't avoid being mutilated.
()
There are only a few actors here. Four who actually get some space. But that doesn’t harm Backcountry. Its strength lies in how it utilizes the beautiful scenery to create drama, which often unfolds off-screen, but that certainly doesn't diminish its impact. On the contrary, there is strength even in that. It's just a pity that the atmosphere isn't a little more escalated. Still a good film.
()
Much better than last year's thematically similar Grizzly. But Backcountry does without the well-known actors and the perfectly trained bear Bart (who can play even the most subtle nuances of expression). While the central bear doesn't look all that menacing on the surface, can't even stand on its hind legs properly, and is even noticeably artificial in some close-ups, he's still much more frightening by acting quite authentically. It's not an unconvincingly intelligent monster that takes revenge and systematically murders people, as in the aforementioned Grizzly, but a normal hungry animal roaming the woods that scares with its unpredictability. The first half is tedious and it's a shame the film doesn't start building tension much earlier. The bear attack, which is visible in only a few shots, is relatively brief but all the more believable. And I imagine that's probably how it would have played out in reality. The whole tent scene, by the way, reminded me of a similarly chilling moment in Herzog's documentary Grizzly Man.
()
Werbung