Regie:
Mike FlanaganDrehbuch:
Mike FlanaganKamera:
Michael FimognariMusik:
The Newton BrothersBesetzung:
Ewan McGregor, Rebecca Ferguson, Kyliegh Curran, Cliff Curtis, Carl Lumbly, Zahn McClarnon, Emily Alyn Lind, Bruce Greenwood, Jocelin Donahue (mehr)Streaming (5)
Inhalte(1)
„Doctor Sleep“ führt die Geschichte von Danny Torrance 40 Jahre nach den entsetzlichen Ereignissen aus Stephen Kings „The Shining“ weiter. Immer noch vom Trauma seiner Kindheit gezeichnet, gibt Dan Torrance sein Bestes, seinen Frieden zu finden. Dieser wird jedoch jäh gestört, als er auf Abra trifft, eine mutige Teenagerin mit einer übersinnlichen Gabe, bekannt als „Shining“. Mit der Erkenntnis, dass Dan über dieselbe Gabe verfügt, spürt Abra ihn auf und bittet ihn verzweifelt um Hilfe im Kampf gegen die skrupellose Rose the Hat und ihrer Gefolgschaft, Der Wahre Knoten, die sich auf ihrer Suche nach Unsterblichkeit vom „Shining“ Unschuldiger nähren. Eher widerwillig schließt sich Dan Abra im Kampf auf Leben und Tod gegen Rose an. Abras Unschuldigkeit und furchtloser Einsatz ihrer Gabe verhelfen Dan, das volle Potenzial seiner eigenen Kräfte zu ergründen — bei der Konfrontation mit seinen Ängsten und den Schatten der Vergangenheit. (Warner Bros. DE)
(mehr)Kritiken (12)
Kings "Shining" ist ein interessantes Langzeitphänomen, das inzwischen zwei Romane (von 1977 und 2013) umfasst, die beide verfilmt wurden, der erste auch als Miniserie, und es gibt ein weiteres TV-Projekt, das anscheinend Overlook heißen wird. Und wie ist der Film Doctor Sleep? Ein anständiger moderner King mit einem hervorragenden McGregor und einer Liebeserklärung an Nummer eins. Vergleichbar mit den Neufassungen von Es oder Friedhof der Kuscheltiere.
()
Eine sehr treue Buchadaption, die mir sehr gefallen hat. Sie knüpft an einen der besten Filme an, den ich je gesehen habe. Der Mut der Autoren von Doctor Sleeps Erwachen war riesig – mit Kubricks Geschichte weiterzumachen, gleichzeitig aber King treu zu bleiben und mehr als nur einen Epilog von Shining zu drehen. Der Film ist hauptsächlich dank Mike Flanagan so ausgezeichnet. Er hat sich zwischen King und Kubrick gestellt, er steht fest und es bleibt nichts anderes übrig, als ihm dafür zu danken. All das originelle und unglaublich eindrucksvolle Reisen durch den Geist (und die Kämpfe); die Stimmung, welche viel besser als in den Trailern ist; die Gefühlsspannung (der Film arbeitet nicht mit Schreckmomenten)… Genau so habe ich es mir beim Lesen des Buches vorgestellt. Dabei fehlte im Buch der größte Trumpf des Films – Overlook. Ich würde schon eine Szene finden, vielleicht auch zwei, denen ich etwas vorwerfen könnte. Aber insgesamt bin ich mit Doctor Sleeps Erwachen so zufrieden, dass ich es nicht kann oder eher nicht möchte. Das Ende ist eine Delikatesse für alle, die Shining nicht nur gesehen, sondern auch gelesen haben… Und Ewan McGregor ist einfach toll.
()
Ich mag den Film Shining sehr - vielleicht weil ich die Vorlage nicht gelesen habe - und das liegt vor allem an der audiovisuellen Aufbereitung und dem dämonischen Nicholson. Ich freute mich also auf Doctor Sleeps Erwachen, auch wenn ich damit rechnete, dass seit 1980 einige Zeit vergangen war und sich das Thema etwas abgekühlt haben könnte. Alle Ängste waren unnötig! Doctor Sleeps Erwachen unterscheidet sich in vielerlei Hinsicht von Shining, so dass es sich nicht um eine bloße Kopie handelt, die altes (aber dennoch sehr zeitloses) Material wieder aufgreift. Mir gefiel, dass sich der Film hauptsächlich auf die "Erleuchteten", ihr Universum und ihre "Jäger" konzentrierte (bei diesen "Wesen" musste ich unweigerlich an Die Insel der besonderen Kinder denken). Als Horrorfilm setzt Doctor Sleeps Erwachen nicht in erster Linie auf Grusel, sondern baut eine unangenehme Atmosphäre mit einigen sehr rohen Szenen auf. Obwohl der Film zweieinhalb Stunden lang ist, hält er die Spannung auf einem anständigen Niveau, und außerdem folgt er kunstvoll der Handlung des Originals Shining (siehe die letzte halbe Stunde). Wäre ich mit Kubricks Film nicht vertraut, würde ich mich im Kino wahrscheinlich verloren fühlen, aber so genoss ich die nostalgische und (immer noch sehr) beklemmende Rückkehr zu Danny und dem "Redrum" Overlook Hotel in vollen Zügen.
()
I figured out the thing had always bothered me subconsciously about The Shining, that basically it is not about that “shining” in the title. In Kubrick’s film, it feels like a mythological element quite inorganically incorporated into an ordinary and simple horror film about people living in a haunted hotel. I bet that nine out of ten people asked to briefly retell The Shining wouldn’t mention that Danny is “special”. Compared to that, Doctor Sleep has a rich mythology set in a universe I would like to return to discover other stories that may be taking place. Warner really failed at selling the film, the trailers left me quite underwhelmed, but in the end, I think this’s been one of the most pleasant horror surprises of this year. And, for the second year in a row, Mike Flanagan has significantly improved the year’s horror balance, clever boy. I like how Doctor Sleep connects to The Shining in a meaningful way, while still being a different film which, with only minor changes, would perfectly work on its own. For a horror film, it’s not afraid to have copious footage, it’s not afraid to use snares or to avoid relying on jump-scares, and nor is it afraid to be nasty and uncompromising in many ways.
()
Doctor Sleep might put you to sleep! Mike Flanagan tries his best, but once again I was not pleased. I find his films terribly uninteresting. This one is a direct sequel to The Shining after 40 years and introduces the main character played by Ewan McGregor (the boy in The Shining) who follows in the footsteps of the True Knot cult who suck the souls out of dead victims. Filmed decently, both Ewan and Rebecca Ferguson, playing the villain, are solid. The music is also good, fans of the first film will be pleased with the many references and the finale is quite intense. But the film is not scary, suspenseful, brutal and certainly not entertaining, I haven't seen such a slow film in the cinema for a long time. I'm personally not a big fan of The Shining either, so this story and mythology doesn't do anything for me and actually doesn't interest me much. I don't want to put it off completely, fans of The Shining will probably enjoy it and IMDB praises it as well, so it's not a dud, more like nothing for me. 55%
()
A difficult to adapt yet incredibly good work by Stephen King. If the screenplay were to strictly follow the structure of the original, half of the running time would be devoted to AA meetings. I therefore understand why Mike Flanagan focused much more on Abra and Rose because their storylines are far more cinematic (albeit not too personal), but poor Danny remains a secondary character. Considering that it necessarily had to follow on the film version of The Shining and less so on the book, the ending is surprisingly strong, more terrifying in terms of its logic, and respectfully faithful to the source material, despite some changes (including the biggest) being frustrating at first. From a story about overcoming one's own shadow, something different has emerged: a horror movie that is not afraid to avoid cheap scares and only uses the atmosphere to pay homage.
()
A great adaptation, faithful enough to the book to please its fans, and different enough for it to tie in with the end of Kubrick’s movie. McGregor is excellent as Danny, but the sexy Rebecca Ferguson’s performance as Rose the Hat is just heaven. Much better than in the book. The climax at the hotel, logically different from the book, is a playful variation on the original Shining, with an ending that closes the circle.
()
It’s been long since a sequel made me this happy. Dr. Sleep lacks the author’s vision and unpredictability of Kubrick’s The Shining, but Flanagan builds a meaningful follow-up story that richly develops the possibilities of Kubrick’s secondary themes, smartly blending it with the events of the previous film. This smart director takes other things from the legendary filmmaker: the approach to the protagonist and the narrative style – throughout the film the adult Dan Torrance is an almost surprisingly passive figure under the control of a girl with a strong shining (in a similar way the hotel controlled his father), while the story gradually shrinks, both in time and space, with Flanagan, like Kubrick, using small time lapses to illustrate it. He also manages to imitate the main style characteristics of the previous film, likewise with the music motifs, the reliance on details of the actors during tense moments, the absence of shallow jump-scares, which are replaced by the strategically organised movement of the characters in the mise-en-scène, and the identical staging of some scenes, which both pays homage to and reinforces the narrative connection with the previous film (McGregor’s conversation with Bruce Greenwood in an office looks the same as Jack’s interview with Ullman at the beginning of The Shining; on the stairs, Rebecca Ferguson uses similar gestures as Jack Nicholson; the conversation with the barman, etc.). The long runtime isn’t a problem, either, the film works from the get go with three strongly motivated camps of protagonists (or rather, antagonists) that are slowly being brought together, plus the brilliant return to the iconic hotel, were all the sequences will be gold for the orthodox fans of the original. The Shining told the viewers that the Overlook was the only evil and dangerous place for people who shine, Dr. Sleep expands this into a vast fictional world where Danny gradually assumes the role of his mentor Halloran and his childish self is replaced by a girl who’s going through a similar development (which is highlighted by the film’s very last shot). The very positive impression is completed by a ton of welcome references, the character of the climax and the excellent actors, led by the traditionally likeable and credible McGregor, though the divine Rebecca Ferguson also deserves praise, she’s convinced me again she’s the most charismatic actress of today (and for me, maybe the past, too). If only every sequel of a famous brand was at least half as good as this one. 90%
()
This is what a movie must look like for people who are always complaining about things from their favorite books being left out of movie adaptations. And in doing so, it's the perfect proof of how false their argument is. Doctor Sleep [very aptly titled in the three-hour director's cut] is a literal adaptation in a killer TV treatment that could practically be described as a video book. The film is nominally divided into chapters (which I last saw, perhaps, in Sphere); most of the running time is taken up with two characters locking themselves into several minutes of static dialogue consisting of two shots. Then, in the finale, the film does stray from the book's premise, but only to follow an awkward virtual tour of the Overlook Hotel with one stilted quote after another. And really any recollections of the original Shining this film awakens make it look all the worse standing next to them. Because this is the complete anti-Kubrick.
()
At first (and for quite a while) it seemed terribly boring. When I looked at the running time, I was seized by horror, but then the story picked up the pace, bad guys began to inhale massively, good guys started thinking about how not to get inhaled and the whole thing came back to life. It was really interesting to watch the two female protagonists (Rebecca Ferguson and Kyliegh Curran) erase their male comrades (Zahn McClarnon and Ewan McGregor). I didn't think I'd have such a good time after such a lackluster beginning.
()
Doctor Sleep is an American-British-Canadian production that blatantly rips off some classic movies. For example, there are some scenes from The Shining, only with different actors, which is nice although I did not feel entertained during those two and a half hours. I did not really care how Danny’s life turned out. Although it may be an OK movie, although as a sequel to a great movie, it is weak.
()
Doctor Sleep is a difficult film for the mainstream viewer to digest. Unlike The Shining, whose strength was in the demonic Nicholson and Kubrick's heavy-handed direction (despite the bitter dissatisfaction of King himself, Kubrick's adaptation is one of the best psychological horror films I've seen), its sequel is perhaps a little too dense in terms of psychology, and at times lacks the necessary punch or uncompromising intensity of some scenes – which was so typical of the original The Shining. On the other hand, I have to honestly admit that I actually quite like Mike Flanagan's approach. The overall psychological depth and the strong focus on Sleep's character kind of goes against the current horror trend and moves the whole thing more into the category of intense drama with thriller/horror elements. It may have been doomed to commercial failure from the beginning (be it because of the slow pace, the very daring length, or the unprecedentedly strong psychology of the characters), but I still quite enjoyed it in the cinema. Mike Flanagan is becoming an increasingly interesting filmmaker, but I'd be very skeptical of any major mainstream success in the future. This specific style of storytelling (I wouldn't be afraid of comparisons to James Gray, who in my opinion is also an excellent and underrated filmmaker) just isn't going to happen much in 2019, and it certainly won't be a box office smash.
()
Werbung