Regie:
Rian JohnsonDrehbuch:
Rian JohnsonKamera:
Steve YedlinMusik:
Nathan JohnsonBesetzung:
Daniel Craig, Ana de Armas, Chris Evans, Jamie Lee Curtis, Michael Shannon, Don Johnson, Toni Collette, Lakeith Stanfield, Christopher Plummer (mehr)Streaming (6)
Inhalte(1)
Wenn jemand etwas von einem perfekten Mord versteht, dann der erfolgreiche Krimiautor Harlan Thrombey (Christopher Plummer). Als der vermögende Patriarch am Morgen nach der Feier zum 85. Geburtstag mit durchschnittener Kehle in seinen Gemächern aufgefunden wird, deutet alles auf einen Suizid hin. Nach ihren nahtlos übereinstimmenden Zeugenaussagen kann niemand von den in Harlans herrschaftlichem Landhaus anwesenden Familienmitgliedern, die von Detective Elliott (Lakeith Lee Stanfield) und Wagner (Noah Segan) vor Ort vernommen werden, daran beteiligt gewesen sein. Für Irritationen sorgt jedoch der berühmte Privatdetektiv Benoit Blanc (Daniel Craig), der von einem anonymen Auftraggeber mit dem Fall beauftragt wurde. Blanc merkt schon bald, dass alle Familienmitglieder etwas zu verheimlichen haben – von Harlans Tochter (Jamie Lee Curtis) über den Schwiegersohn Richard (Don Johnson) bis hin zu seinem Enkel Ransom (Chris Evans). Blancs untrüglicher Instinkt sagt ihm: Hier handelt es sich um ein raffiniertes Verbrechen! Um die Wahrheit herauszufinden, setzt er auf die Einzige, die durch Harlans Tod nichts zu erwarten hat: seine Pflegerin Marta (Ana de Armas). Die ist jedoch alles andere als begeistert, denn auch sie hat nicht alles über die Todesnacht erzählt. (Das Erste)
(mehr)Kritiken (17)
Ein cool stilisierter Krimi mit famosen Schauspielerinnen und Schauspielern. Das Ende hat mich aber nicht besonders begeistert. Einerseits konnte man seine Elemente wegen den vorherigen Ereignissen voraussetzen, andererseits stand die Figur verdächtig im Hintergrund. Die Zeit, die ich in dieser Gesellschaft und mit so einer geschickten Arbeit der Filmemacher verbrachte, habe ich trotzdem voll genossen. Es hat mir mehr Spaß als Branaghs neue (zu sehr digitalisierte) Poirots gemacht.
()
Der Trailer hat einen Oldschool-Krimi versprochen, was auf den Film auch zutrifft. Er hat mir ungefähr bis zur Hälfte sehr gefallen. Es war super, wie wirklich jeder gelogen hat und wie die Figur von Daniel Craig (an den ich mich eine Zeit lang gewöhnen musste) all die Lügen mit einem wissenden Lächeln akzeptiert hat. In der zweiten Hälfte geriet der Film ins Stocken. Auf einmal hatte ich das Gefühl, dass ich den Ermittlern einen Schritt voraus bin, obwohl so etwas nicht passieren sollte. Dieses Gefühl hat sich nach und nach bestätigt… Bis ich mir ganz sicher war. Es macht mir nicht so viel aus, wenn mich das Ende von einem Krimi nicht schockiert oder nicht überrascht. Ich mag es aber nicht, wenn das Ende unbefriedigend ist und keinen Eindruck in mir hinterlässt, weil es schrecklich kompliziert wirkt. Das würde weder Agatha Christie noch A. C. Doyle passieren, auf deren Werk Knives Out – Mord ist Familiensache baut.
()
Rian Johnson brachte eine sehr unterhaltsame und spielerische Hommage an das Detektivgenre im Stil von "Whodunnit" und gewann mit seinem effektiven Regiegeschick und intelligent geschriebenen Drehbuch auf ganzer Linie bei mir. Die Schauspieler werden hier nicht nur als kommerzielle Lockmittel eingesetzt, um eine bereits oft gesehene Prämisse aufzupeppen, sondern passen wirklich perfekt und verkörpern ihre Charaktere, wodurch ein humorvolles Panoptikum in einem originell gestalteten Schema entsteht. Mit anderen Worten - alles, was ich beim kürzlich glatten Mord im Orient-Express hatte, verwandelten die Filmemacher mit ihrem richtigen Ansatz in absolute Positiva. Daniel Craig und Ana de Armas, wow. Und die Fortsetzung? Her damit.
()
Als eingefleischter Fan der klassischen Krimis von Agatha Christie habe ich mich sehr auf dieses starbesetzte Genre-Experiment gefreut, und nachdem ich den Film gesehen habe, kann ich sagen, dass Knives Out - Mord ist Familiensache definitiv nicht im heutigen Filmgewirr untergehen wird. Johnson kokettiert spielerisch mit den Erwartungen des Publikums und den Regeln des traditionellen Kriminalromans, und das gelingt ihm wirklich gut. Auf der einen Seite gibt es einen seltsamen Detektiv, der gleichzeitig wissend und deplatziert wirkt, und die Hauptheldin mit einem empfindlichen Würgereflex gegen Lügen. Auf der anderen Seite steht ein Haufen meist verlogener Familienmitglieder, die auf ein Erbe aus sind. Und aus der Ferne lacht ein kürzlich verstorbener, begeisterter Go-Spieler über all das. Die flott und klug geschriebene Geschichte spielt fast die ganze Zeit mit dem Zuschauer, so dass die zwei Stunden im Kino wie im Flug vergehen. Auf jeden Fall einer der unterhaltsamsten Filme seines Genres.
()
Es tut mir sehr leid, dass ich den Film wohl zehnmal gesehen habe, was fast meine Bewertung negativ beeinflusst hätte. Es handelt sich um eine Kombination aus Agatha Christie, Ich weiß, was du letzten Sommer getan hast, Die Forsyte Saga und irgendeiner verrückten Komödie. Den Autoren ist es gelungen, alle Zutaten toll zu mischen, wozu man erstklassige Schauspieler braucht, angeführt von James Bond und seinem neuen Bondgirl alias der neuen Partnerin von Ben Affleck. Ich bin zufrieden und habe darüber nachgedacht, wie schön es auf der Welt wäre, wenn alle Lügner sofort nach jeder Lüge kotzen müssten... Dann würden Wahrheit und Liebe tatsächlich siegen...
()
I've always liked Rian Johnson and I like how inventive his films are, and I think the best word to describe Knives Out is ‘cunning’. Johnson manages to lull the audience initially by making the film look more or less like a classic whodunit, with several suspects and a killer hiding among them. But after about twenty minutes, Johnson starts playing with genres, procedures, story and overall directorial delivery. He makes several drastic style changes, manages to poke fun at the audience, the clichés and his own characters, and is one step ahead of everyone in the room the entire time, for just when you think you've got Knives Out figured out, you find that Johnson has once again outsmarted you. And you're going to love it. By the way, I haven't seen a movie in a long time where it's so terribly obvious in all the actors how much they are enjoying their work and characters.
()
I could rate this film with four stars and say it’s a very entertaining, witty and funny detective movie. But Rian Johnson not only directed his film, but also wrote its script. And he wrote it as a homage to Agatha Christie, who conceived her detective stories in a similar spirit. Form the beginning, you have to pay close attention to what is going on in the film. Even the tiniest detail might be of importance in the investigation. If I said anything more, it might be a spoiler, so I’ll just say that if you like Hercule Poirot and his investigations, try to watch this with as little knowledge of the plot as possible, and look forward to Daniel Craig’s performance. Even though everyone’s performances are perfect, listening to Daniel’s ingeniously eccentric English was just divine. I enjoyed this greatly, that’s why I’m giving this five stars. Knives Out are a detective story you don’t get to see today, offering an original plot hardly anyone would write these days (except for book-based films). For me, it was an absolute film orgy.
()
A loving pastiche tribute to classic ensemble detective stories displaying contempt for film genre stereotypes and a good old detective story with everything you would expect. The movie really wants to represent all of that. And it surely does. Unfortunately, not in such a way that the individual approaches would complement each other. So each scene has a different approach. In some cases, scenes are conflict with each other. As a result, the individual approaches pull the rug from under each other´s feet and there is a problem with that. The last nails in the coffin are the film's extremely long running time and the really poor acting in the second half . Nevertheless, Blanc's excessive and absurd character has potential, and no matter how unjustified the running time is, you won't be bored.
()
I can't be enthusiastic about it, but for me it's absolutely similar to Murder on the Orient Express. The cast is perfect no doubt about it, Daniel Craig as the detective is decent and Ana de Armas is as always adorable, but it didn't draw me in at all. It's not funny and certainly not entertaining, nothing much actually happens for the two hours, until the final minute twist that saves the whole film to at least average, but by then I was looking forward to getting out of the cinema. Disappointment of the year and Rian Johnson has definitely confirmed that he will never make a film that I will like. 5/10
()
It's a beautiful film. An imaginative case with a good bunch of interesting characters, some of them played by great actors. Needless to say, even those who were less known or completely unknown to me fit in with them easily. The whole thing is orchestrated by Daniel Craig, who leaves Bond behind completely and kicks things off as a very charismatic detective. The kind with real insight that you trust will crack the case in the end, but you still have to watch him do it. For me, it's basically a perfect show. 5 stars.
()
I have mentioned several times that I am not really fond of classic detective stories that revolve around a sophisticated criminal and an even smarter detective who doesn't need a team of colleagues, and for whom uncovering the culprit is primarily an intellectual feat. As the years go by, my aversion to the world of better people where these stories usually take place only intensifies. Such detective stories represent a stylized spectacle with stereotypical characters, typical settings, and beloved props, and in my opinion, it is too artificial and bourgeois. Therefore, I accepted my daughter's invitation to the movie theater with certain hesitation and assumed that it would be somewhat uninspiring. However, it was a pleasant surprise. Director Johnson, who is also behind the screenplay, does indeed like detective stories, but he is not afraid to play with the rules and turn the genre into a bit of a parody. Light exaggeration is omnipresent, and the cast members clearly enjoy their roles and add a dose of ironic detachment to their performances without turning the film into a blatant parody. The result should satisfy not only fans of the genre but also those who find the classic formula of detective stories somewhat cliché. The choice of Daniel Craig for the role of detective is daring because he would be more suitable for the tough American school or the opposite side of the law, but it works. In addition, the members of the wealthy family are charming in their animosity and shortcomings. Overall impression: 75%.
()
A spectacular modern crime movie that bends the rules of the genre. Johnson is the narrator, so it’s hard for the audience to get lost. The tension could be cut with a knife almost throughout the movie. An incredible acting recital. Craig’s investigator removes all memory of Bond and Ana de Armas carries the heart of the entire story on her shoulders. This movie is like a donut with a hole in which there is another donut…with a hole…with a great climax inside.
()
At times unobtrusively and sophisticatedly funny and cynical, at times thoroughly convoluted and superbly acted. Perhaps only Daniel Craig was irritating with his crazy accent. Apparently they exploit everything that could be exploited from a murder in an opulent mansion. I reckon most of the 40 million-dollar budget went to the cast, because the visuals were very economical, sometimes too much (the car chase). A good one off, but no deal-breaker.
()
Fantastic piece of work. Together with Once Upon a Time in Hollywood and The Irishman, this is the only film of the year where the very process of dosing the information and the flashy revealing of the plot was such a joy. And this is not something to watch only once because its charm fades after you know the outcome; I’ve watched it twice already and the second time I enjoyed even more the concept as a whole, the genre references and the jokes, which often come from perfect editing and the clever alternation between the concealed and the contrasting perspectives of the characters being interrogated. Moreover, the dominant narrative element is not the curiosity over the identity of the murderer (ignore these parentheses due to spoilers: which is highlighted by the fact that in the end, nobody committed that murder), but the entertaining way it guides the attention through flashbacks, ironically tuned relationships and the reveal of the backdrop instead of the perpetrator. And also, thanks to the brilliant actors and the smart dialogues, I believe I will have just as much fun in further viewings, or with the likely sequel. 90%
()
"Just look around. This guy literally lives on the Clue board." The dead guy is a wealthy author of successful mystery novels, one of the suspects is so old that no one knows how old she actually is, another one throws up whenever she lies. The rest are a bunch of poor, rich parasites, with no one seemingly having a motive for murder, so translated, everyone. And it's all investigated by a famous detective on the verge of incompetence, whose investigative methods lack perhaps only the method of strenuous squats. Once every five years, I'm regularly delighted to discover that the author of the perfect Looper and especially my beloved Brick is still alive and kickin', without being pigeonholed by Hollywood conventions, despite the fact that he probably had to be kept in chains by studio reps while filming the tired spinoff The Last Jedi. While it's a shame that his typical camera and editing gimmicks are lacking here, and the heroine is basically just the kind of innocent walking pair of eyes you wouldn't otherwise notice at a party of people like Craig, Curtis, Shannon, or Collette, let us be satisfied with the insanely unhinged script with Inspector Trachta at the helm. I'd rank Christopher Plummer's office here, alongside the shag-sub from The Spy Who Loved Me, as one of the coziest spaces I've seen in a film.
()
I originally wanted to rate the film four stars but, recalling the individual scenes to write my review, I realized that I was still chuckling to myself, so I had to give five. The cast was excellent, the dialogue was crafted to perfection, the plot was so incredibly intricate that I didn't know what to expect until the end, and it was great fun.
()
Rian Johnson has created quite an engaging piece of work in terms of the script, the first and last third of which follows the standard whodunit formula. The middle part then transforms, somewhat unexpectedly, into a bourgeois struggle for inheritance, which results in a drastic slowing of the entire narrative. I've long wondered if this is a major flaw or if Johnson in fact brings an imaginative upgrade to the concept of the standard murder mystery with this genre charade. Since I've come to appreciate the "middle class" much more after a second viewing, I consider Knives Out one of the most imaginative murder mysteries of recent years. Plus, the strong moral (perhaps even touching) credit of Craig's character is believable and is pretty damn necessary these days.
()
Werbung